Film Travels 2020: Ireland

The best that can be said of Irish cinema today is that it certainly exists. Even with its
strata of ‘worthy’ and ‘unworthy’ films, its commercial entertainments and its dark
dramas, Irish film at least now produces enough films for there to be such divisions in the first place.
– The identity of an Irish cinema by Dr. Harvey O’Brien

Brooklyn_1Sheet_Mech_7R1.inddBrooklyn, John Crowley’s internationally celebrated Irish film from 2015, features a recognizable and common distinctive among Irish film- the relationship between a longing for a distinctive Irish culture and presence and the reality of it’s prolonged Diaspora. The tension between these two sometimes complimentary and often opposing cultural forces still exists today even as Ireland’s modern cinematic landscape has managed to grow a stronger sense of identity, with some animosity existing between the Irish and Irish-Americans/Canadians (for example) who like to claim they are Irish. As one writer put it, as this conflict grew, more and more it became an obvious struggle between empire on one side and capitalism on the other.

FAMINE AND THE DIASPORA
Ireland’s rocky cinematic history begins in the way most nations do, with the first Lumiere images making their way to the Country in the 1890’s. What is interesting about these images is that they reflected a brief period of optimism for a people people who had lived through the tragedy of the Potato Famine. These images would soon give way to violence and more despair.

And yet, these picturesque depictions of the early emergence of the moving image would become an important symbol for Irish cinema, the product of a small island and a modest population. Given how the Potato Famine had displaced its people to foreign territory, the struggle of early Irish cinema would set the tone for years to come, forcing Irish film to depict Ireland from a distance. As these stories evolved, they came to depict the immigrants story somewhere between a love and longing for the homeland and the promise of more prosperous conditions elsewhere. And while the Country continued to struggle on a socio-political level, what is clear today is how important Irish cinema would become to protecting and developing a true Irish heritage. As the Country went so did its cinematic presence, and it becomes clear looking back, and even looking at Ireland today, that where Ireland was able to establish a localized industry and film community, Country and people were also at their strongest.

WAR, CIVIL WAR, CULTURAL IDENTITY AND FURTHER DIASPORA
With World War 1 and the fight for independence just around the corner, Irish cinema would suffer the same fate as so many Countries around the world. As the war wreaked havoc on Countries and cultures and economies, the loss of cultural and national identity became a byproduct. As the war ended, cinema would go on to play a massive role in the reconstruction of this identity, and thus the Country, around the world, including in Ireland.

What makes Ireland’s story unique from places like Italy and France is that they would find themselves once again a decimated community being thrust into yet another war, this time the civil war for Independence. With the Country already struggling to reclaim its people, something that had plagued even the optimism of James Joyce opening Ireland’s first cinema in Dublin in the early 1900’s, those films coming largely from abroad and/or attracting foreign filmmakers to film in Ireland rather than developing Irish films and Directors. Even one of Ireland’s earliest and most popular films of the early silent era, The Lad From Old Ireland made by the newly established Kalem Film Company, was an example of a film that had more connection to abroad. And time would reveal that even though the Kalem Film Company was based in Ireland it had very little to do with Ireland or growing Irish identity itself (closing up shop in 1914).

THE FILM COMPANY OF IRELAND AND THE CONTINUED FIGHT FOR IDENTITY
The Film Company of Ireland (http://filmireland.net/2017/06/14/early-irish-cinema-a-new-industry-the-film-company-of-irelands-first-season/) attempted to change the narrative that had been set by the Diaspora and Ireland’s international sprawl, opening in 1915 and developing in the early post war era before facing immense struggle in the face of the civil war. The film Knocknagow, which released in 1918, is notable for its attempt to reestablish the Irish story and an Irish mythology. One note said that film was intentional in competing against the American film Birth of a Nation, apparently even outgrossing it. And while the company would not survive the civil war (their most successful film, Willy Reilly and His Colleen Bawn, coming right before its demise), it would pave the way for important policies and movements following their Independence.

Another one of the most recognizable aspects of Irish film is its relationship to Ireland’s Protestant-Catholic past and its relationship to National politics with the ongoing division of North and South. Of note is something called the “Censorship of Films Act” (https://www.tcd.ie/irishfilm/censor/), a policy which basically came to determine the character of truly Irish film according to “Catholicism and republicicicisim.” On the flip side, this would establish the means by which film could also push back on these things on an artistic, and therefore cultural level.

This policy was established in 1923, and it would connect later to the National Film Institute (https://ifi.ie/about/history/), an institution created by the marriage of Church and State to uphold Irish Catholic vision and values in film as part of their National identity. This comes in the face of the still ongoing struggle to separate Irish Identity from the dominating pressure of foreign and international presence, such as The Film Society of Ireland, an independent film company concerned with bringing international film to Ireland. What was clear in Ireland was that while Irish filmmakers abroad and international film efforts coming to Ireland to take advantage of their landscape did exist, in order to establish a National identity and culture they needed a way to define that story and that identity according to their own voice. Theater and literature had a strong presence in Irish culture, but the reach of cinema in the modern age proved most necessary to develop now, something that kept evading them even as Countries like Italy had seen a resurgence in cinema and the strengthening of their people and Nation. So while censorship is never a great thing, the one positive that did (and does) come out of it is the ability to develop a unifying ethos. The National Film Institute strengthened the relationship between the Irish people, the Government and the Film Industry, thus giving them a tangible place on which to begin defining what it means to be Irish.

It is out of this that Ardmore film studios would emerge, which as one article put it, “was the Irish Government’s first serious attempt to encourage the development of an Irish Film Industry, a modern studio facility in Co. Wicklow suitable for both national and international production. Ardmore was intended as a signal to the world that Irish cinema had a place on the international stage…”

FROM STRUGGLE TO IDENTITY- IRISH CINEMA EMERGES
As I continue to travel the world through cinema in 2020 I am continually shocked by just how big of an impact the emergence of television had on the global film industry. It is easy to assume that television was simply the latest incarnation of a constantly evolving industry (similar to how we view streaming), but that misses the context of how television impacted these Countries. What is often missed is the many shadows that so many of these Countries had to emerge from, particularly when it comes to wars both global and internal, and how vital the film industry was to rebuilding these Countries in times of great uncertainty. The truth about television is that it has never and does not play a similar role. In fact, in so many of these Countries it is had the opposite and adverse affect. Because of the nature of how television works it tends to decentralize rather than unify, blurring lines between art and its relationship to national identity. It simply does not contain the same impact and definable cultural force that film is able to have on the development and health of a Country.

At the same time, television has consistently placed immense pressure on the film industries around the world which have been so integral to protecting and building a Countries ethos and identity, and there is ample evidence to show that as the film industry goes, so does the Country in the modern age. This is at least in (no small) part due to the fact that one of the great shifts of the modern age is away from the kind of cultural touchpoints that used to bring people together (such as live theater). Cinema plays the role it does precisely because it has the ability to bring people together around these collective stories of identity and form in the way other artforms cannot. Films can hold national identity in one hand and establish that on international soil with the other.

So it was of no surprise to me then to discover that Ireland faced a similar narrative. As John Ford would release one of Ireland’s most defining films (A Quiet Man) in 1952, the rise of television would, as one writer put it, have “a disastrous affect on Irish Identity, combining with the decline of cinema.” And yet, the inspiration of the Irish cinematic story is one that makes my own Irish-Canadian heritage jealous. As we enter the 1970’s, we see a reinvigorating and hard nosed movement to not let cinema die and to breathe into it a new commitment to using it to shed light on the Irish people and identity. And while Irish Cinema today is a shadow of what, say, American Cinema represents in content and numbers, their conviction to the artform in the face of consistent outside pressures (like streaming) actually stands taller in its relevance. With the pride of cinema comes a pride of Irish heritage and a stronger and more unified Country, something doubly important in a land still divided. The Film Act of 1970 allowed Irish Film to expand and to grow (http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20120621-travelwise-the-evolution-of-irish-cinema), while the Irish government was one of the first and early adapters of a film tax initiative. The films that emerged from this became what is known as the Irish First Wave, demonstrating a fresh vision for art and Country.

“What all of these New Wave films have in common is their desire to challenge what had
gone before them in cinematic terms. These films aggressively debunked stereotypical images of Ireland and Irish people on film and sought to challenge audiences to see Ireland in a different light.”

The future continued (and continues) to have its challenges of course, particularly in the eventual demise of The Irish Film Board in 1987 and the loss of that unifying voice. But the persistence of the Irish people resulted in films like My Left Foot (Jim Sheridan), The Crying Game (Neil Jordan), The Commitments (Alan Parker), all independent Irish products, paving the way for the rebirth of The Irish Film Board in 1993. Fast forward to today and you have an industry that, not unlike the earlier days of Italian cinema, has found a way to grow in genres, proving to leave quite a footprint in animation (Cartoon Saloon) and even in the likes of horror. But the most important undercurrent appears to be this-
“While big-budget international productions keep crews working and are enormously valuable to the country, it is the indigenous industry that is at the heart of creating opportunity and giving skills and experience to Irish producers, directors, writers and crew, telling the stories that emerge from Irish-based talent.”

As cinema goes, so does Irish identity. And like modern Ukraine, the stronger their identity the stronger Irish Cinema is becoming. It is proving that it doesn’t need to be America in order to succeed, boasting the highest rate of cinema admissions in Europe. It can, simply, be Ireland.

*For my Film Travels, here is the full list of Irish Films I have seen. It is a working and ranked list available on Letterboxd:
https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/list/film-travels-2020-ireland/

SOURCES
Barton, Ruth, Irish National Cinema (Routledge, 2004)
McIlroy, Brian, Shooting to Kill: Filmmaking and the Troubles in Northern Ireland
(Flicks, 1998)
McLoone, Martin, Irish Film: The Emergence of a Contemporary Cinema (BFI, 2000)

http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20120621-travelwise-the-evolution-of-irish-cinema
http://filmireland.net/2017/06/14/early-irish-cinema-a-new-industry-the-film-company-of-irelands-first-season/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cinema_of_Ireland
https://www.volta.ie/#!/page/608/a-short-history-of-irish-cinema
https://www.ifi.ie/downloads/history.pdf
The identity of an Irish cinema by Dr. Harvey O’Brien

Cinema in Retrospect- My Month In Film, February 2020

It’s that time again. A chance to reflect on what landed for me in February, the stories that stood out and what I am anticipating in March:

WHAT LANDED
the-rhythm-section_1200_400_widthThe RHYTHM SECTION, a late January holdover, turned out to be a pleasant surprise. Suffering from a lack of advertising, poor critical reception and breaking the kind of records you don’t want to break (making the least amount of money on a weekend for a film on as many screens as it had), this one was bound to get shoved under the rug and quickly forgotten. Which is a shame. Blake Lively gives an inspired performance, it features one of the great car chase scenes in recent memory, and as thrillers go its competence actually gives way to some compelling moral questions.Worth checking out when it becomes available at home.

maxresdefaultMOTHERLESS BROOKLYN, a film that also ended up largely forgotten and mostly missed in theaters, found its release on VOD this month. To be honest, I was mixed on the film when I saw it on the big screen, but a rewatch this month grew my appreciation for it on a number of levels. I loved the New York Noir setting, and I really appreciated how Edward Norton, in his Directorial debut, shows a real knack for being able to blend together theme, performance and structure in a very methodical and natural way. He has a real future ahead of him behind the camera.

960x0Back on the big screen front, BIRDS OF PREY (AND THE FANTABULOUS EMANCIPATION OF ONE HARLEY QUINN) is a TON of fun. It proved that when you have someone like Margot Robbie breathing life into a problematic franchise (Suicide Squad), her powerful vision, an inspired and dominating lead performance, and a willingness to scale back the budget and get a bit more creative went a long way to making this work as well as it did.

Unfortunately the film has been labouring to find the audiences that studios expected and hoped for, so the future is a bit uncertain. But hopefully it finds a way to convince the studio that the risk was worth what we gain in quality.

download (3)Also just released to the big screen are two undeniable gems, including the winning romance THE PHOTOGRAPH, a subtle cinematic work that is chalk full of wonderful beats that move us from comedy to mystery to dramatic concern. It’s quiet and not in any way flashy, but it gradually draws you in.

And then likely the best of the February crop, THE INVISIBLE MAN shows how to reimagine a familiar concept for modern audiences, being not only the more successful horror film to land in the early goings so far, but a well crafted film that earns its scares and does some really interesting things on a technical level.

Outside of the big screen, I had the chance to catch up with a few more standout FRENCH FILMS for my “Travel The World in Film” challenge (the joyous romp that is PLAYTIME, Godards emotionally resonant  VIVRE SA VIE, the infectious entry into Demy’s trilogy THE UMBRELLAS OF CHERBOURG, the horror tinged THE NUN, and the stylish PORT OF SHADOWS).300px-Play_Time_apartments

I also managed to see the spiritually compelling THE MILL AND THE CROSS, the brilliant anti-western MCCABE AND MRS. MILLER by Robert Altman, and LOCK, STOCK, AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS, one of Guy Ritchie’s earliest efforts and probably still his best.

 

 

THE STORYLINES
February often anticipates what many perceive to be the true start to the cinematic year. That’s not to undersell this past January, which had a pretty decent showing with BAD BOYS FOR LIFE, the fairly popular DOLITTLE, the vastly underseen and underrated UNDERWATER, wide releases of 1917, WEATHERING WITH YOU and PAIN AND GLORY, the bonafide hit THE GENTLEMAN (Guy Ritchie’s latest stylish romp) and the straight to VOD LITTLE MONSTERS. But everything from big name titles to genuine hopefuls made their way onto the calendar for February hoping to kick things into full gear.

However, one of the things challenging for the attention of cinephiles this year was the earlier than usual schedule for THE OSCARS. And if you were paying any attention at all, it would be impossible to miss what likely became February’s biggest story, PARASITE’S historic win.MV5BYWZjMjk3ZTItODQ2ZC00NTY5LWE0ZDYtZTI3MjcwN2Q5NTVkXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODk4OTc3MTY@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_ Not only did it make history in terms of being the first foreign film to do a lot of things on the night, but the win translated into a wonderful and endless line of dialogue and articles and conversation about foreign films in general, the reward and challenge of engaging subtitles, and the nature of art on a global level.

Even more of a pleasant surprise was the storyline of the films cinematic resurgence here in NA, successfully drawing in audiences to the big screen even after releasing to VOD. Hands down, this has to be one of the most notable and impactful Oscar winners in recent memory.

On the other side of that is poor BIRDS OF PREY’s uphill battle. Not getting the attention it deserves made its underperformance the talk of a good few weeks of February. On the other side of that coin though is the unexpected success of SONIC THE HEDGEHOG. It’s problematic production, namely the uproar over Sonic’s earlier design, has caused more than a few prognosticators to ruminate on this seeming new found relationship between public opinion and its ability to impact a film’s production. They made the changes and apparently audiences are happy, coming out to show their support.

Also of note is the uphill slog that is horror 2020. GRETEL AND HANSEL does have its passionate supporters, but February has only solidified the dire state of the genres early entries. Films like FANTASY ISLAND, BRAHMS: THE BOY 2 and THE TURNING, among others, aren’t being seen and aren’t being embraced, at least until THE LODGE came out in limited release (still not available in Winnipeg) and THE INVISIBLE MAN’s  recent success turned those fates around.download (4)

One last shout out to THE CALL OF THE WILD. I consider it to be a minor miracle that this film actually debuted to a solid critical rating, and that it went on to do fairly well at the box office and with audiences. There are so many things that could have gone wrong, and it gets some of the most important things right in terms of approaching the adaptation. Say what you will about watching a CGI dog (I found Buck endearing, even in the dated style), what anchors this tough reimagining is a stubborn commitment to the novel’s philosophical core.

1368060781-1And in case you missed it (as I unfortunately did due to a rough February personally speaking), one of the many reasons to consider supporting our local arthouse, CINEMATHEQUE, is this past months AFRO-PRAIRIE FILM FESTIVAL. It featured a stellar lineup and is one the only places to catch some smaller releases (such as Les Miserables and Clemency). The festival is over, but look for smaller films and festivals to screen here all year round. It always promises to be a very involved and enthusiastic crowd of fellow cinephiles.

WHAT I”M LOOKING FORWARD TO IN MARCH
First off, if you didn’t get a chance to see THE INVISIBLE MAN yet, it’s still in it’s first week. So early March leaves plenty of room to squeeze that in. There is also the much buzzed about PORTRAIT OF A LADY ON FIRE, which is playing at Grant Park Cinemas here in Winnipeg through the end of this week as well.

MV5BMTZlYzk3NzQtMmViYS00YWZmLTk5ZTEtNWE0NGVjM2MzYWU1XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDg4NjY5OTQ@._V1_In terms of March releases though, the month kicks off with a bang, featuring a new installment from Pixar called ONWARD. We knew very little about this film seeing as it was a largely unknown original currently being overshadowed by Pixar’s second more anticipated original to release later this year (SOUL). Early word appears to suggest that tempered expectations will work in its favor.

Also watch out for possible expansions of the well received EMMA, and the limited release of the buzzy FIRST COW, which is unlikely to show up in Winnipeg in the early running but is one to keep an eye out for.download (5)

Following on the heels of Onward is Affleck’s widely advertised THE WAY BACK, which looks to be a solid entry into the inspiring sports drama category, and the newest Comic Book installment called BLOODSHOT, headed by the popular Vin Diesel. The much postponed but still fairly hyped (somehow) MY SPY will also finally be seeing wide release.

On delayed releases, watch out for the controversial THE HUNT, a film that has had a long, rocky road to the screen. Curiosity has me interested in THE HUNT, but I won’t lie, I’ve been waiting patiently for THE WAY BACK, which feels like it will hit Affleck’s sweet spot, and MY SPY, which looks like a fun time out at the theaters.

Perhaps the biggest splashes of March releases might be A QUIET PLACE 2 and the live action remake of MULAN. They have been doing a bang up job at advertising both of these films, and whatever questions I might have had in terms of how they make this sequel and this remake feel necessary have been put at ease.

Here is to another great month. Happy viewing y’all. And as always, my reviews of the above films are available here at Letterboxd for anyone interested:
https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/

The Good Place Finale: Exchanging Mystery for Finality

04f1f479-5359-462f-bda9-d49bbf373a20After 4 full seasons of contemplating the afterlife using a good blend of humor, emotion and chemistry, the much beloved series The Good Place came to a close this past week. Known for its ability to take deep philosophical and theological ideas and break them down into bite size questions and relevant conversation that anyone can understand and relate to regardless of religious affiliation, the show was consistently striving to present the idea of the afterlife as a mystery to explore rather than a fact to exploit.

One of the more brilliant aspects of the way the show was scripted over these 4 seasons was how it used its depiction of the afterlife to position the “good” place and the “bad” place as a working commentary both on the lives we live in the present and the nature of the afterlife itself. By placing these two ideas as a moral construct, the show then weaved through different aspects of the  moral equation, particularly in how it plays into moral responsibility, judgement and motivation. By applying what C.S. Lewis refers to as the “Christian imagination” towards a more generalized spiritual concern for matters of life and death, it encouraged viewers to ofen wrestle with matters of faith in ways that could get us thinking about our relationship to faith in one way or another.

The way the show was able to keep this conversation alive through all 4 seasons is by seeing it through the lens of the great mystery. To speak of the afterlife was to speak of shared “human” concerns.

(SPOILER WARNING FOR THE FINAL EPISODES OF THE GOOD PLACE)
THE GREAT MYSTERY UNDONE

That is until the series decided it was going to bring the conversation to a close. This set up the daunting and challenging task of taking the wealth of its ideas and weaving it into a single and final episode as something that both honors the journey while bringing the character arcs to a fitting close.

And I do think there were ways the series could have achieved this. But it would have required them to stay true to this idea of the afterlife as a mystery to explore. Unfortunately,  the show chose to abandon the mystery in favor of easy answers and a proper solution, the end result being a frustrating and often contradictory mess of ideas.

Just to explain this further, let me unpack exactly what I mean by walking through the final two episode arc:

THE GOOD PLACE: SEASON 4, EPISODES 13-14 (WHENEVER YOUR READY)
The second last episode takes all the mystery out of the series and exchanges it for a decidedly and determined nihilistic premise. In this final picture of the afterlife, after so much time playing around with the idea of selflessness, eternity becomes little more than an idealized version of our best life built here on earth, built around the pursuit of happiness, materialism and personal pleasure. When they come to realize that happiness based on these self predicated ideals gets tired, and that once you have accomplished all that you want to do, they come to the conclusion that what affords someone personal happiness and fulfillment is actually death itself. It is knowing that something won’t last forever that gives it meaning. Thus, whenever your ready indicates the choice to die. This is the prefered afterlife that all of us truly want deep inside.

Enter the invention of a door where, after living their best life and accomplishing all that their heart desires, the people in the good place can walk through and, we are told, cease to exist. The final message of the series at this point? It could go two ways. One is that eternal life as an idea is simply an idealized version of life on earth. The second message, which is more metaphorical, is that everything we have experienced in the afterlife is intended to say something about this life on earth being all there is, so make the most of it before you time is up.

Which is really where most of the problems begins to surface. This premise only works in a world where everyone is free to write the story of their life the way we feel it should be written. By doing away with the mystery, the show essentially creates a smoothed out and glorified depiction of death that ignores the question of suffering. Its “spiritual” imagination is basically the sum total of our earthly desires, with our experience of life on earth determining our happiness.

It romanticizes death without acknowledging what death actually means for our lives. It offers a false picture of happiness in order to elevate death as meaningful. And what makes this perhaps most dangerous of all is that it provides a meaningful argument for suicide that completely ignores its tragic nature. Yes, they are already dead, but by confusing the show’s final two points, this afterlife is presented as a metaphor for life on earth, so it becomes easy to see how the show wants us to translate these truths to the choices we make now. 

Further yet, it has a serious problem to contend with in terms of explaining the immortality of the good place architects against the now mortal souls of the earthly residents. Why is it that the place responsible for life on earth is an image of immortality, while the creation itself is seemingly more enlightened? This is of course where the film begins to lean into the Eastern mysticism and philosophy, leaning towards the idea that we all become gods who then desire mortality. But the confusing mashup of ideas turns the entirely of the show into a contradictory collection of statements, a burden the second last episode places entirely on the shoulders of the final hour.

And ultimately the last hour takes the easy way out of the hole it dug for itself, ignoring the problems and going for melodramatic.

We see it backtrack on its idea of the door as necessarily nihilistic. Remember when we said the door means you cease to exist? Well, we are going to slip in a line near the end of the episode that tells us that we don’t know what happens after you walk through that door.

For all the lessons that the characters have learned about selfless love, the choice to walk through the door has nothing to do with what happens next and everything to do with what makes them ready to end their lives, all of which are a series of self serving ambitions.

And then we factor in Michaells decision to become mortal. Is that an answer to the architect/human problem? Seemingly. Maybe. But it basically turns the divine in the show into a self serving entity dependent on humanity to give it value. To experience life is the ideal, and to live and die is what gives him true dignity and purpose. Only, it turns the entire notion of the afterlife into a wishlist, a simple buffer to help erase the pain and uncertainty and struggle of life on earth so that we can die with dignity.

And then guess what. In case we had any question of a concrete world view for the show, at the last second it then decides to come back to Hindu and Buddhist philosophy as a way of coloring over the problems it chooses to ignore, but it does so in an equally disingenuous fashion. It picks and chooses in order to find the easy way out of the problems it wants to ignore, essentially ignoring the spirituality and leaning into its secularist, Westernized expression. On the surface it feels nice and emotional and complete, but once you take off the cover all the problems start to spill over, leaving me feeling very unsettled, frustrated and let down.

NUP_187913_1281.0As someone who has long struggled with anxiety and depression, including suicidal thoughts, these final episodes left me in a pretty dark place. In his wonderful article on the finale, SPENCER KORNHABER writes, “Characters became so sated by the world’s meaningfulness, and so jaded by the seemingly infinite possibilities of creation, that they had no reason to go on. Perhaps this was a logical conclusion. It is hard for any viewer to evaluate it, much less viscerally relate, as none of them has lived an eternity—much less the specific version of eternity this show constructed.

What many people have lived are days in which the case for existence beating nonexistence seems unconvincing.”

In his article he puts into words why I felt so disillusioned with the final two episodes. This is at least in part because I was so invested in the show over these past years, a testament to its strength and vision. I had come to trust in where this narrative was going, that it would give me the freedom to enter into the mystery of life and death with freedom and grace. What I got is a show that ultimately confirmed my deepest struggles. The fact that my life looks nothing like The Good Place means that suicide and nihilism are my best option. It makes me feel lied to, not only by the show but by life.

And yet, the mystery still remains. That to me is the more powerful realization. I am reminded that there is reason to enter into the conversation and to see past myself. I’m reminded that even though this world pushes back, there is something greater to live for than my own personal happiness. That is what gives me hope. I don’t fear eternal life, nor is the answer to all my problems. What the Good Place is to me is an invitation to engage the Christian imagination and wonder about how my life here on earth points me to a life with God in ways I can only understand in part but trust that one day I will understand in whole.

I would encourage you to read through the article that Spencer wrote for the Atlantic. He articulates it so much better than I could. I would also encourage anyone who struggles with suicide or depression or anxiety to know that there is life beyond this show. Ending ones life is not the answer to our struggles with this world, it is simply the only thing we can see sometimes when everything doesn’t make a whole of sense, feels overwhelming, less than ideal and too much. If you feel that way, embrace the conversation. Seek out others. That’s the part of the show that is most important.

Here’s the link to the article:
https://www.theatlantic.com/culture/archive/2020/02/good-places-finale-made-heaven-look-hopeless/606001/

OSCARS 2020: My Thoughts and Predictions

eeaf9e7342a0d077a20f395dfcb8791e3d240e5afc2b69f74870afcac3979626Say what you will about the Oscars, and to be clear, every year around this time cinephiles (like me) do seem to have a good deal to say (it’s easy to be cynical about the idea of Hollywood celebrating Hollywood after all), but these two things are almost always guaranteed- they are hard to ignore, and thankfully they are almost always fun to discuss.

As the crew at Letterboxd suggested during a special podcast episode dedicated to getting us ready for this years ceremony, getting mad about Oscar picks, winners and snubs and getting excited over that rare win for a film we actually love is what makes tuning in every year worthwhile. It is what the Oscars symbolize though that makes “it” worthwhile…

IT’S NOT ABOUT THE WINNERS, ITS ABOUT THE CONVERSATION

This article was posted in one of the online film communities I am a part of:
https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2020/1/29/21060179/oscars-academy-awards-season?fbclid=IwAR3CtFAQW4IA4vFWH4oQ5xsrCcahsvWhaf4Zk_AQVE_dOXSIkEELseYlKDs
It’s a worthwhile read. It is all about recognizing the idea that awarding a given film a “Best Picture” is actually a bit absurd. There is no such thing as an objectively “best” film. In one of my favorite quotes the author writes,


“Art, in contrast, is the most subjective thing humans make. It changes based on who’s looking at it. Something that moved you to tears leaves me stone-cold; something I found indelible, intricate, and well-designed makes you shrug. Art is as much the creation of its audience as its creator, and that’s what makes it important: When we watch a movie or read a book or observe a painting or listen to a symphony, our inner landscapes respond in ways that are distinct and, if we’re open to it, can change us, too.”

This is why making space for conversation about film is important, and one of the best things about the Oscars is the rare opportunity to do that collectively.

And there is value, as the hosts of the Letterboxd podcast point out, to the way in which the Oscars, as a collective venture,  can be a sort of time stamp that allows us to look back and remember those larger stories and context that gave shape to a given year, be it fear, struggle, joy or celebration. This is what makes the Oscars worthwhile.

With that in mind, what I would like to do now is walk through what I perceive to be the major storylines that are giving shape to the year that was 2019, and then offer my humble (read: not professional) picks for each category based on who I want to win, who I think will win, and who to watch out for.

THE STORYLINES
What happened to the diversity?
It wasn’t that long ago that the Oscars came under widespread scrutiny for a serious lack of representation. The knock on the Academy (the voting body) is that it is made up of mostly older white males and that they tend to vote for older white males in the above the line categories. If you are of any other age, ethnicity, color or sex, there is a good chance you will face an uphill battle in getting your film nominated, let alone seeing it have a chance to win.

And so when the tagline #oscarssowhite started to take over social media, they were forced to step up and make some changes. Which is of course how reform works. The Academy broadened their voting body by bringing in a greater diversity of members, and fell back on recently incorporated ideas such as increasing the number of films that are able to be nominated in the Best Picture category along with bringing in what is known as the preferential ballot. These things were seen as opportunities that could help foster more inclusion and diversity down the road.

Which makes the fact that all but three of the films from 2019 nominated for Best Picture were made by older, white males that much more egregious, with Greta Gerwig’s absence in the Director category even further stealing from Little Womens opportunity to seriously contend. Of those three, Bong Joon Ho is South Korean, Taika Waititi is a New Zealander and Gerwig is the lone female representative.

Enter story #2…. The Little International Film That Could.
As happens in every Oscar season, the race might technically begin in January, but it doesn’t really begin until October. October/November is seen as that sweet spot that studios tend to covet, where they are able to release their films early enough to generate buzz and create conversation but not so early as to end up being forgotten or neglected.

What made things more interesting this year is a shortened season. With the awards happening at the beginning of February as opposed to March, it made it that much harder for studios to get their films into the hands of voters, let alone for those following awards season to be able to predict and find clear frontrunners and stories to latch on to in their prognosticating.

Which makes the sudden and seemingly unstoppable emergence of Parasite as a serious awards contender that much more surprising. If it manages to do what many once thought impossible and take home both International and Best Picture (a real possibility), it will have managed to outpaced early favorites The Irishman and Marriage Story, the later frontrunner Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, and all the last minute noise of 1917.

In a year dominated by old white males, a win for Parasite would be considered by many to be a true victory for diversity and a boon for smaller studios, being the first time an International feature has won at the Oscars.

Because (Story #3), oh that money…
There has been no lack of ink spent on detailing the problem of overspending on Oscar campaigns this year. The numbers from Netflix, which has demonstrated a real interest in trying to break into and dominate the awards season fold over the last two years, were astronomical, reportedly topping their record 60 million last year by spending over 100 million this year (they dispute that number, downplaying it to 70 million, but it is worthwhile pointing out that they also disputed the 60 million last year, claiming it to be 30 million less than what it actually was).

More than just a matter of dollars, this translated into a record number of films from Netflix that were pushed into the fold, and translated into incredibly luxurious screening packages and illustrious perks meant to woo people with the excitement of a once in a lifetime trip or opportunity.

Now, it is not unheard of for studios to try and woo voters. The big studios have long been in the game of investing in their films in ways that will grab voters attention. But there is a real difference between the way this used to happen, on more equal ground, and the way things are trending now, where big money is about to outplay the smaller players.

When big dollars are at play, the ones who hurt the most are the smaller players, and they often hurt in ways that are less visible. So while Neon has managed to unearth a bonafide hit in Parasite that could very well go on to win a lot of awards on Sunday, the larger reality for studios like Neon and A24, among many others, is that the benefit of Oscar season is about more than just the winners. It is about the chance to be represented and the ability to shine a spotlight on their creatives. An unfair playing field puts a real burden on these studios in an already trying landscape.

For my money, what the Oscars really need is campaign reform, a way to ensure that all the players have a chance to be represented on equal ground. For what it’s worth, reform also needs to reach into how this voting happens, finding ways to ensure that votes are not being unfairly bought and that voters are actually watching the films they nominate and vote for.

And if you have never engaged closely with the Oscars before or have never been interested in how voting works, here is an article that explains the voting system fairly clearly:
https://collider.com/how-best-picture-oscar-voting-works/

There are of course many more storylines weaving through the above and below the line categories and through all of the different awards shows that happen throughout the season, all of which should make Sunday interesting in its own right. It has been pointed out that the crop of Best Picture nominees this year happens to hold the highest collective rating since 1976, so there are lots of great films to be excited about. But one last thing to note as I move into my personal predictions- all of these categories are interconnected, and therefore trying to string together the different stories and different reasons for my personal picks is dependent on how I see the cards falling across different categories.

A very small example: if they award one film in the Directing category, chances are greater that they will try and represent a different film in Best Picture. Below the line categories also tend to impact above the line categories, often predicting where the preference will fall in the biggest categories depending on who has momentum, who they might feel still needs to be recognized, and what is in competition.

Which is all to say, trying to predict winners is dang near impossible, because a single category can send multiple ones spiralling in opposite directions in a snowball effect.

Nevertheless, to predict is to take part in the fun, so choosing most but not all of the categories to weight in on (keeping mostly to above the line ones), here are my thoughts on the likely and hopeful winners and who to watch out for this coming Sunday 🙂

MY OSCAR PREDICTIONS

VISUAL EFFECTS
“Avengers: Endgame”
“The Lion King”
“Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker”
“The Irishman”

“1917”

Should Win: Avengers: Endgame
Will Win: 1917
Watch Out For: The Irishman
Popular opinion is betting on a win here for 1917, recognizing this as one of the below the line categories that can represent this well loved and popular WW1 film as a true Best Picture contender. Right now 1917 appears to be the Best Picture frontrunner, or at the very least destined to take one of Best Director or Best Picture. Honoring it with multiple awards in these below the line categories could help make the case for its frontrunner status.

However, there is good reason to watch out for The Irishman in this category as well. It appears very likely that The Irishman could away with no awards on the night, making this one the few categories where it could be represented. I have my personal feelings about the Visual Effects in The Irishman (underwhelming and distracting), but there is no denying that the deaging was a pretty big part of that film’s marketing.

If I had it my way though, I’d be handing it to Endgame for its monumental achievement in bringing the MCU to an epic finish. Of all the films, it is the one where the Visual Effects are most prominent and most integral to the film’s overall ethos.

ORIGINAL SONG
“I’m Standing With You,” “Breakthrough”
“Into the Unknown,” “Frozen II”
“Stand Up,” “Harriet”
“(I’m Gonna) Love Me Again,” “Rocketman”

“I Can’t Let You Throw Yourself Away,” “Toy Story 4”

Should Win: (I’m Gonna) Love Me Again
Will Win: (I’m Gonna) Love Me Again
Watch out for: Into the Unknown

Allow me to quickly clarify with this caveat- the real “should” win in this category should have been Glasgow (No Place Like Home), which failed to crack the nominations list for some absurd reason.

I also feel really torn over seeing Harriet get some recognition and throwing my love in Rocketman’s direction. (I’m Gonna) Love Me Again is the better song, and given how prominent a role music plays in what is an equally exceptional film has me leaning in its direction.

And thankfully all signs seem to point to Rocketman standing a good chance of winning in this category, which would make me extremely happy. It’s a semi-musical biopic that deserved far more attention in this awards season.

However, don’t ever underestimate a Disney animated powerhouse franchise film. Chances are pretty good that most of the voting audience either saw Frozen 2 or heard their little ones singing it somewhere along the way, which does bode in its favour.

ORIGINAL SCORE
“1917,” Thomas Newman
“Joker,” Hildur Guðnadóttir
“Little Women,” Alexandre Desplat
“Marriage Story,” Randy Newman
“Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker,” John Williams

Should Win: Joker
Will Win: 1917
Watch out for: Joker

This really is a two horse race. There is a world where Joker, the film with the most amount of nominations on the night, is a slam dunk to win this award. I have a funny feeling though that the love for 1917 might carry it through the night, with this being one of the smaller categories it will steal. With these two soundtracks being neck and neck, my guess is Newman will prevail over my preferred choice of Guonadottir.

ADAPTED SCREENPLAY
“The Irishman”
“Jojo Rabbit”
“Little Women”
“The Two Popes”

“Joker”

Should Win: JoJo Rabbit
Will Win: Little Women
Watch out for: Jo Jo Rabbit

This is a tricky one to analyze personally speaking because this is the only chance Jo Jo Rabbit really has at being represented, a film I adored. And I do think it is both deserved and in actuality a real possibility that it could win. The film does have a bit of controversy holding it back, with not everyone responding well to the way it uses the Holocaust as a way to evoke humor. But it also has a good deal of respect among voters and critics. That and the one most likely to challenge it (Little Women) has been adapted a number of times in the past, which some voters might look down on.

The better bet though I think would be to see the award going to Little Women. Given Gerwig’s absence in the Directors category, I believe this will be where they try to rectify that as a small token of its praise. And I have no qualms with that either, as I think the screenplay is one of the films brightest points, a product of a lot of creative thinking and research that brought to fresh light a film that has been adapted numerous times.

ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY
“Marriage Story”
“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”
“Parasite”
“Knives Out”

“1917”

Should Win: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Will Win: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Watch Out For: Parasite

All signs seem to be pointing to Best Director and Best Picture being an even split between 1917 and Parasite (roll the dice on which one takes it). Which means this is where they will honor the most Oscary film in the face, Tarantino’s Once Upon a Time in Hollywood. Yes, Pitt is all but a shoe in for supporting, but if my hunch is right and Hollywood also wins for best cinematography, the pairing of these two awards would recognize the best parts of one of the year’s best films, And you know all those old, white voters want to find a way to do that 🙂

ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Kathy Bates, “Richard Jewell”
Laura Dern, “Marriage Story”
Scarlett Johansson, “Jojo Rabbit”
Florence Pugh, “Little Women”

Margot Robbie, “Bombshell”

Should Win: Florence Pugh
Will Win: Laura Dern
Watch Out For: Margot Robbie

Dern has been cleaning up during awards seasons, and there is absolutely no reason to think she won’t repeat come Oscar night. But Florence Pugh should be the frontrunner. Her turn in Little Women transformed a beloved literary icon in the minds of a lot of people. To take something so familiar and make it your own is a challenging task, and I think she not only succeeds, but this also helps to cement her place in Hollywood as one of the great young talents. I am not holding out hope that they will surprise me by taking such a sharp right turn, but should they deviate from the established norm and go in her direction I would be more than thrilled.

As it stands, the more likely candidate to upset Dern (a verrrrrrry big long shot) is Margot Robbie. I think Bombshell is seen as the more important film on a socio-political level, and that could sway them to honor it by way of Robbie, who is also at the height of her career and one of the bright young stars.

ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Tom Hanks, “A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood”
Anthony Hopkins, “The Two Popes”
Al Pacino, “The Irishman”
Joe Pesci, “The Irishman”
Brad Pitt, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”
Should Win: Tom Hanks
Will Win: Brad Pitt
Watch Out For: Jo PesciMy preferential vote is 100 percent biased. A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood was my number one film of the year, and knowing the work that went into bringing its creative vision to life, especially considering how large the character of Rogers looms in the minds of viewers, is truly inspired and humbling when I think of Hanks.

However, this is Pitts award to lose, and I will not be begrudging him at all when he takes home the statue. His turn as the stunt double ambling his way through the tricky world of Old Hollywood while building this budding friendship with DiCaprio’s Dalton is wonderful to behold, and I think Pitt is proving that he only gets better and better with age.

Speaking of age though, there is a world where Pesci finds a way to break out of retirement to woo those old voters who might see him in The Irishman as a reminder of their past. People know his name, and they could consider this as their last chance to send him off into the sunset with an award honoring his career. And you can’t underestimate how visible Netflix has made this film to voters.

ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE
Antonio Banderas, “Pain and Glory”
Leonardo DiCaprio, “Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”
Adam Driver, “Marriage Story”
Joaquin Phoenix, “Joker”

Jonathan Pryce, “The Two Popes”

Should Win: Joaquin Phoenix
Will Win: Joaquin Phoenix
Watch Out For: Adam Driver

For me, the best part of Marriage Story is Driver, and it is not out of the question that he could sneak his way back into the fold via the popular vote.

But the general and populist view has Phoenix, the one element of Joker most voters seem to agree on, walking away with this award. And I think he is more than deserving, being one of the great all time actors of our time. His role is transformative, and I do think that voters who appreciate Joker will also see its larger and relevant social commentary as one of the reasons to award him the statue over the others in this category.

ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE
Cynthia Erivo, “Harriet”
Scarlett Johansson, “Marriage Story”
Saoirse Ronan, “Little Women”
Renée Zellweger, “Judy”
Charlize Theron, “Bombshell”

Should Win: Cynthia Erivo
Will Win: Renee Zellweger
Watch Out For: Saoirse Ronan

Erivo has little to no chance of walking away with this award, but in my imagination I picture her shocked and humbled by the unexpected honoring of her turn as Harriet and accepting the statue with a phenomenal speech that honors the real life hero she depicts on screen. Harriet is a dynamic and important film that made a decent amount of money (relatively speaking) and yet still managed to remain largely unseen. I would just love for the film to be recognized, and what better place for that happen than through its powerhouse, leading star.

But let’s not kid ourselves. Like Dern, Zellweger has cleaned up in awards season, and if I’m being honest I don’t take issue with her winning here either. I’m a pretty big fan of Judy as a film, and I think Zellweger’s performance as Judy is inspired. The fact that it screams Oscar performance also helps her case a lot.

But just to throw this out there for your consideration, it is entirely possible that the Academy might still be looking for a way to redeem Gerwig’s absence in the Best Director category, and if that is the case, Saoirse Ronan would be an excellent chance to do that. She is one of our great, rising stars, and she puts in an excellent and memorable performance as the films lead. Her performance is deeply indebted to her relationship with Gerwig, and there is little doubt she would take the opportunity to honor her Director as well.

CINEMATOGRAPHY
“1917”
“Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”
“The Irishman”
“Joker”

“The Lighthouse”

Should Win: Once Upon A Time in Hollywood
Will Win: Once Upon a Time in Hollywood
Watch Out For: 1917

It might be crazy to bet against 1917 in this category, but I just can’t imagine Once Upon a Time In Hollywood walking away with only a Best Supporting Role win. I do think that they will try and reward this monumental film in both of its most deserving categories (this and screenplay), and I am holding on to this wishfull thinking as my preferred winner as well.

But I will not be surprised if 1917 edges it out. It is expected to be the frontrunner for taking the most awards, and cinematography seems the most natural fit for a film being recognized for its editing and single take motif. I just have a feeling that they will relegate 1917 to mostly below the line categories, giving Hollywood its due here.

DOCUMENTARY FEATURE
“American Factory”
“The Edge of Democracy”
“Honeyland”
“For Sama”

“The Cave”

Should Win: For Sama
Will Win: For Sama
Watch Out for: American Factory

This is one of those categories I’m rolling the dice on, because all the storylines seem to suggest that American Factory is the film to beat, and by a long shot. But I just can’t shake this feeling that For Sama, a Documentary that I’ve also heard lots of insiders suggest is the best documentary outside of Apollo 11, which somehow was left off this list (a head scratcher up there with last years Wont You Be My Neighbor).

If For Sama wins I will probably be doing a jig in my living room. It is an exceptional and important work, and beyond that a true achievement that deserves all the praise. American Factory might seem like the better fit with its political emphasis, but For Sama is by and large the most deserving.

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE
“How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World”
“I Lost My Body”
“Klaus”
“Missing Link”
“Toy Story 4”

Should Win: Missing Link
Will Win: Toy Story 4
Watch Out For: Klaus

Toy Story 4 is the safest bet here. It’s the film most voters are likely to have seen, it was critically well received, made a lot of money, and many feel like its achievement in earning its spot as an unforeseen and somewhat skeptical fourth film is due the recognition.

But while I don’t think anyone would be begrudging its win, there are two compelling storylines that could elevate both Missing Link and Klaus as the one to take it down. Both have managed to snag awards earlier in the season, and both have the benefit of peaking in the conversation at just the right time. Klaus is the one that appears most ready to surge ahead at the last minute, but there are two things that could make Missing Link a real dark horse- it’s not a Christmas film (The Academy doesn’t tend to nominate Christmas films) and second, people genuinely love and respect the animated studio that brought it to life.

FOREIGN LANGUAGE FILM
South Korea, “Parasite”
Spain, “Pain and Glory”
France, “Les Misérables”
North Macedonia, “Honeyland”

Poland, “Corpus Christi”

Should Win: Parasite
Will Win: Parasite
Watch Out For: Parasite

Is there really any other option? I confess, the only other category (outside of the shorts) that I have seen fewer of the nominations in is Documentary. I have seen two of the Foreign Language films, the other being the very good Pain and Glory. But calling this race is about more than the quality. You could look at every stat available concerning films nominated in both Foreign Language and Best Picture, and the simple fact is they will all point you to a decisive Parasite win come Sunday.

DIRECTOR
Martin Scorsese, “The Irishman”
Quentin Tarantino, “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood”
Bong Joon-ho, “Parasite”
Sam Mendes, “1917”

Todd Phillips, “Joker”

Should Win: Quentin Tarantino/Bong Joon Ho
Will Win: Sam Mendes
Watch Out For: Quentin Tarantino

When it comes down to it, this is what will ultimately decide the fate of the Best Picture winner. If Sam Mendes gets his name called here, look out for Parasite to win the big one. If Tarantino or Bong Joon Ho win here, well then things just got a whole lot more interesting, especially in retrospect.

I will say this though. My gut says this and Best Picture are in a real battle to position Bong Joon Ho or Sam Mendes head to head, giving this to one and BP to the other. With that said, I am not counting Tarantino out by any means. I do think they will reward his film in other categories, but Once Upon a Time In Hollywood was once upon a time the frontrunner, and a good campaign could just as easily turn this into an unexpected dark horse, maybe even going so far as to gain a Best Picture win.

BEST PICTURE
“Ford v Ferrari”
“The Irishman”
“Jojo Rabbit”
“Joker”
“Little Women”
“Once Upon a Time…in Hollywood”
“Marriage Story”
“Parasite”

“1917”

Should Win: Parasite
Will Win: Parasite
Watch Out For: Once Upon A time In HollywoodYes, I know. 1917 is considered the front runner in this category. But since I pegged Sam Mendes as taking home the trophy for Director, I believe Parasite is going to be the one to cross the finish line first. There is just too much momentum right now behind Parasite to stop it, despite 1917 being a really strong challenger. It is beloved by viewers and critics, became a box office sensation, and has a strong story devoid of conflict or controversy. This is where I believe we will see the expanded voting body in play. Not that 1917 is a bad film. Far from it. If it won it would also be deserving. But I think Parasite has the chance to go down as one of the most memorable wins in Oscar history. The little film that could, and it has a lot of people in its corner. Many are longing for the headlines that feature the International Film that managed to break down barriers. The success story that united and won over audiences young and old. Technically brilliant and socially relevant.

Just to step outside of that cloud for a second though, consider this. If Parasite and 1917 end up getting caught up in the competition, especially if they start to rack up a lot of the smaller awards, the one film that I could see shaking things up by stealing some of the coveted spots, be it Director, Cinematographer or Screenplay, would be Once Upon a Time. A passionate plea for this film not to get lost in the shuffle could, and just might, make one of the great comebacks in recent history and surprise everyone in the biggest category of all. If that happens I will also be happy. I actually have Hollywood ranked above Parasite in my end of the year rankings. However, it’s hard not to want to root for the underdog here, and I am very much with all those who are hoping to see Parasite do something spectacular.

Cinema in Retrospect- Looking Back at January 2020

The month of January is notorious in the world of cinema for two things- being a dumping ground for forgettable films and filling empty screens with rereleases of Oscar hopefuls.

Of course there are always exceptions to this rule (see Paddington 2 and Patriots Day), but by and large this tends to hold true.

On the Oscar front, this past month featured a wealth of nominees that are either set to remain in theaters until at least this Friday or are currently available on VOD and streaming.

The ones in theater that are worth your time: Little Women, Jo Jo Rabbit, Frozen 2, 1917, Parasite and A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood (my number one film of 2019). 1917 should certainly be at the top of your priority list if you are considering the big screen expeience, and both Parasite and Beautiful Day are pretty incredible films to expeience with a crowd.

On VOD you can also catch up with the much talked about Joker and the perfectly crafted Once Upon A Time in Hollywood, two of my personal favorites of 2019, as well as the wonderful end to the trilogy and quadrilogy of How To Train Your Dragon 3 and Toy Story 4.

Also readily available is The Irishman, The Two Popes, I Lost My Body, and Marriage Story, all exclusive to Netflix.

If you are interested in my thoughts on the Oscars, including predictions and hopefuls, I plan to do an Oscar write up before the ceremony this Sunday Night. So watch for that upcoming.

If you are looking for fresh 2020 titles to help bring in the new decade, you are in luck. While it might look a bit scarce and forgettable at first, reflecting back on the month gone by proved that this Janaury was stronger than first appearances allow.

Here are the January films that I think are worth your time:

MV5BNzM0OGZiZWItYmZiNC00NDgzLTg1MjMtYjM4MWZhOGZhMDUwXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTkxNjUyNQ@@._V1_1. Underwater (3.5)– Really happy to see that this surprisingly fun horror sci-fi action film is still holding on to a couple screens. Starring the often misunderstood and undersold Kristen Stewart, the film evokes serious Alien vibes as it manages it’s way through some superb set pieces with a subtle interest in themes of female empowerment.

download.jpeg-12. Bad Boys For Life (3.5)– This is not a perfect film, but it is a perfectly constructed reboot that proved a perfect tonic for the cold January days. Making headlines for breaking records, fans are clearly responding to this one in big numbers. And for good reason. After a plethora of reboots and remakes in 2019 that failed to be seen and/or crashed and burned, all signs pointed to this being yet another failed attempt to breathe life into nostalgia. But replacing Director Micheal Bay with Directors Adil El Arbi and Bilall Fallah, two relative unknowns, pegged next to tackle Beverly Hills Cop 4 in 2021, proved a perfect recipe for success. Bad Boys For Life feels fresh and familiar in all the right ways, dialing down the over the top action set pieces and trading that in for a strong emotional core and some enriched character study. Working in a few twists and surprises, this is a franchise that feels perfectly positioned for the future.

MV5BMDNkODA5ZGQtODczOS00OTQxLThhMTItMjk0ZmNhMDM0YjNmXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMDM2NDM2MQ@@._V1_3. Dolittle (3)– I don’t think anyone will be talking about this one come the end of the year, but children’s stories like this tend to be a rarity these days, and ratings seem to suggest that this is something general audiences are appreciating and responding to. It has done decently well, even if it has a long road to travel in making up its sizable budget. For me its blend of quirky interactions, sentimentality, an inspired performance by Downy, adventure, and a solid message about our relationship to the created world was enough to transport me into its story and put a smile on my face.

MV5BMTlkMmVmYjktYTc2NC00ZGZjLWEyOWUtMjc2MDMwMjQwOTA5XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTI4MzE4MDU@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_4. The Gentlemen (3.5)– Directed by Guy Ritchie, it should not be undersold that this is an original project. With its blend of humor, edgy characters and scripted fun, this is one that has some very real and very rewatchable appeal.

e4dccc9b_7aa6_47a8_8d6a_48738dd78757_pk_3_trs07353k.05. Rythym Section (3.5)– A solid thriller with a really good lead performance and strong supporting cast. Don’t let the headlines of this film’s record breaking box office slump deter you. This is one that is unfortunately getting lost in the shuffle and is far better than those appearances might lead you to believe.

6. Danger Close (3), an Australian film with a unique flavor, and Little Monsters (3.5), a quirky and crazy children’s film that is most definitely NOT a children’s film are two solid VOD releases worth checking out. Both are currently available on Hoopla.

And because they saw wide release in January. I’m considering both of these 2020 films:
weathering-hero7. Weathering With You– The follow up to the beautiful Your Name, this anime film from Japan will be a solid candidate for animated film of the year come December. With its striking visual presence and solid story, it is worth taking the time to check out on the big screen while you can.

MV5BYmM4YzA5NjUtZGEyOS00YzllLWJmM2UtZjhhNmJhM2E1NjUxXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTkxNjUyNQ@@._V1_8. Just Mercy (4)- An emotional crowd pleaser with an important message, this popular drama is still playing on a couple screens. It is proving to really resonate with general audiences, and is benefiting from a strong advertising campaign. If you haven’t had a chance to check it out, keep it on your radar. It should be making its way to VOD fairly soon.

I haven’t yet seen The Last Full Measure, a war film that has connected strongly with fans of the genre, but trusted voices have all suggested this is a late January release punching above its paygrade, even as three supposedly less than stellar horror releases (The Grudge, The Turning, Gretal and Hansel), 3 films I haven’t found time to see, are quickly fading from the collective memory.

Comparitively speaking, this has proved a diverse line up with some decent and good options to help ramp us up for February’s decidedly more high profile presence…

LOOKING AHEAD

Some upcoming films to keep an eye on:

download.jpeg-21. 3 high profile Horror films are set to take North American cinema by storm- The Lodge, which has already garnered rave reviews, the much anticipated The Invisible Man (featuring the always incredible Elizabeth Moss), and the intriguing but still unknown Fantasy Island. My money is on The Lodge, but watch out for the other two to make a splash.

MV5BNjgwNjkwOWYtYmM3My00NzI1LTk5OGItYWY0OTMyZTY4OTg2XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODk4OTc3MTY@._V1_2. The long awaited release of Portrait of a Lady on Fire is almost upon us. This international film made quite an impression during festival season last year, and its delayed release has been frustrating more than a few of us cinephiles. Now we will finally get to see what all the fuss is about.

3. A few big profile releases, kicking off with Birds of Prey, a spin off of Suicide Squad which promises to leave the worst parts of that film behind and bring Margot Robbie (it’s best part), both as lead and as Director, to the forefront.

MV5BNzUwMTcyODQtNDBjMi00YWM3LWE1NzItODgxZWQyMjNlZGQ0XkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNTE1NjY5Mg@@._V1_I’m kind of still intrigued about Sonic the Hedghog, and Bloodshot looks like the real deal, but the one I am most excited about is the coming adaptation of The Call of the Wild. I loved the novel, am a sucker for these types of wilderness films with animal characters at their center, and love Harrison Ford.

MV5BMzQ3NTQxMjItODBjYi00YzUzLWE1NzQtZTBlY2Y2NjZlNzkyXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTkxNjUyNQ@@._V1_UX182_CR0,0,182,268_AL_But just in case you are second guessing Birds of Prey, everything that I have heard so far suggests it’s a super fun romp with an unexpected edge.

MV5BN2NlODlkZWEtN2U2OC00MTI4LTlhMTEtZTM0MDIyODZiMDhhXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMTA1NTA1MTI4._V1_4. Two small time projects with big time appeal- The Photograph is on my most anticipated list, a quiet love story that explores themes of love and commitment. But the one I am REALLY looking forward to is a film called Wendy. From the Director of the amazing Beasts of the Southern Wild, this is a take on the Peter Pan story that blends a child like perspective and imagination with real world struggle. It looks incredible and promising, and I can’t wait to get swept up into its fantastical vision.

Honorable Mention: Downhill

If you haven’t yet seen the amazing Swedish film Force Majeure, do yourself a favor and check it out. I’m having a hard time reconciling the two leads in this American remake with the nature of the source material, but I am still somewhat intrigued by the way the new one appears to differ in tone and style.

Happy viewing 🙂

 

Travelling the World Through Film 2020- ITALY

Journey to Italy

In my review of Roberto Rossellini’s wonderful love letter to Italian culture and countryside, 1954’s Journey to Italy, I reflect on what this film’s highly romanticized depiction of an Italian way of life meant to me. Having had the opportunity to travel to Italy and experience the culture first hand I know the power it holds. Despite its history and challenges and problems (of which there are many of course), these romanticized ideals are more than the simple fascination and curiosity of an outsider. Italy has a way of uncovering, in a very short amount of time, not only the unspoken dissatisfaction and struggle (with the world, your life, yourself, and perhaps others) that is lingering within our souls, but also our passion and our desire to discover life in the fullest. If you live further West (as I do), it becomes clear that their way of life is so distinctly counterintuitive to our own that visiting the Country operates like a wake up call to how unaware of life’s cherished moments we can sometimes be in our addiction to business and productiveness. To embrace Italy is to embrace a way of life that makes time for doing nothing. That values a simple cup of coffee, lingering over meals, in person discourse and community over privatization, public spaces, appreciating ones surrounding be it architecture, natural beauty or artistic creativity.

I know for both my wife and I, we came back transformed but also disillusioned with how antithetical our life here was to these basic values. And in many ways this is precisely the same tension that we see seeping into the external relationship struggles that lies at the center of the story in Journey to Italy. These are two people who have become unknowingly disillusioned with their way of life, and their journey to Italy helps to expose them to a different way of life, one that challenges their own preconceptions about what is most important and opens them up to appreciating what matters most.

Since visiting Italy, I actually became deeply interested in learning and uncovering what it is that makes Italian culture so enrapturing and compelling. Over the years, my own research seemed to come down to these three things:
1. A unique and diverse National Identity
2. It’s focus on family and community
3. It’s focus on the arts

Given how integral the arts is to their culture, when I committed to travelling the world through film in 2020 it didn’t take long for me to land in Italy as my starting point. And the more I delved into its cinematic history over this past month, the more heightened these three ideas seemed to become as interconnected realities.

Cinema

THE BIRTH OF CINEMA IN ITALY
It would be true to say that Italy was a relative latecomer to the growing popularity and growth of cinema in Europe. It is also true that Italy would go on to be one of the most influential forces in cinema in its pre war and post war development. What was interesting to discover is how both of these truths are a direct of product of Italy’s foreign influences, and that it was its dependence on these foreign powers that inhibited its ability to develop a true cinematic presence early on, and its development of a cinematic identity that later helped give rise its unique, nationalistic identity.

Like the rest of Europe, the history of film in Italy follows a similar path. The futurist movement, a modernist push that originated in Italy and pushed the world outwards towards a fresh, collective embrace of progress and technology, opened the door for cinema to thrive in some respects, and later, as a possible product or marriage of fascist leaning ideologies, inhibited it through the existence of oppressive regimes.

Leading up to the rise of Futurism, and heavily defined by French, Swiss and German influence, Italy’s early films- Eiloteo Alberini’s La Presa di Roma (The Capture of Rome) in 1905 is the first Italian fiction film, while L’inferno (in 1911) is considered the first full length Italian feature, reflected an initial insurge in collaborative efforts, followed closely by a brief period before the First World War in which we start to see the foundations for what would eventually emerge as a National, Italian cinematic identity.

Like the rest of Europe, Fascists restrictions on culture in the 1920’s/30’s limited the making of film, and it wouldn’t be until the 1940’s that we see the rise of the Neorealist movement, an artistic approach that would go on to become one of the most influential movements in film history, revitalizing the industry both in Italy and internationally (with Directors like Vittorio De Sica, Roberto Rossellini and Luchino Visconti emerging as distinct, Italian voices).

ITALIAN NEOREALISM
Much of what I read suggested that the biggest reason Neorealism was able to emerge was because of Italy’s early surrender in World War 2. One of the first Neorealist films, or at least the one most recognized internationally (Roberto Rossellini’s Rome, Open City, the same Director who built the first cinema in Rome) was actually filmed on location two months after Italy’s surrender. The reason for this connects back to this idea of foreign powers and influences. It afforded them time to adjust and reflect on Italian culture and experience while protecting what the war had stolen from them. They were able to take its influences (French, German and Soviet roots geared towards poetry and expressionism) and begin to use them in this space to rediscover their own voice.

At the same time, Neorealism became the first movement to reject the overwhelming presence of American Hollywood conventions, carving its own path against the pressure of a globalized front. As I heard one writer describe it, “Neo indicates the defying of traditional conventions, elaborating on the moral and social components of traditional realism, and of verismo, by nature extending and reformulating its borders. It’s this conversation between old and new is what allows realism to constantly be taking on new forms.”

What defines Neorealism as a movement and gives it a distinct Italian presence is that it found a way to give cinema back to the people. Emerging in a time and space largely undefined, both innately aware of the tragic and devastating reality of the war on one side, and an uncertain but hopeful future on the other, filmmakers emerged from the rubble with a desire to cast non-actors, to tell stories in sometimes unscripted ways, and to shoot on location. The themes that emerge through these films are honest and raw, dealing with matters of real social concern while elevating the strength of the Italian culture and countryside as an almost eternal force at the same time.

Open City

As one article I read suggested, Neorealists were immune to the critique that invaded the Hollywood form on an international level. This enabled them to persist the way they did because they could not be “popularized” or shoehorned in the same way according to adherence to specific styles and genres, with this writer making a specific connection between popularization and the politicization of films. These were films with a message, but they were the voice of the artists and the people whom the stories were bringing to light rather than the politics themselves. This is what gave Neorealism (and its inspired offshoots such as The French New Wave) a distinct and intimate documentary style as well.

Ossessione-750x400

From its very first expression (Ossessione in 1942), many of the films of this period are considered to be some of the best films ever made, defining not only a genre but a Country. What became known as the Marshall Plan (again, a mirror of a kind of globalization, albeit a very corrupted one) would lead to its dissolution, but because of the way cinema invested in an authentic Italian identity and pride the Country was able to maintain its position as a prominent cinematic presence, moving into new frontiers, and exploring new genres (it’s last recognizable one comes from the 70’s, a deviation into the horror genre with German influences called Giallo, and the infamous Italian Spaghetti Western is notable as well).

L'Aventura

THE POWER OF ITALIAN CINEMA
As another article suggested in reflecting on one Italy’s most prominent Directors, “For De Sica, there is an answer to everything, except death. When the worst thing has happened, life nonetheless goes on.”

Tree of the wodden

This to me is the sentiment embodied most readily in the Italian films I have had the privilege of seeing. I think back to the way Journey to Italy was able to capture the devastation of a broken relationship and set this amidst the glorious allure of the Italian way of life in a transformative fashion. There are the early indications of a culture interested in the creativity and craft on display in the impressive feat of Dante’s Inferno. The subtle beauty of Di Sica’s family drama mixed with such a stark social commentary in Bicycle Thieves. The stunning neo-realist sensibilities on display in Rome, Open City, a film brave enough to critique the social reality while imaging a glimpse of social reform.

Umberto D.

The touching emotion of Umberto D that reaches across generational divides and discussions of the old and the new. The captivating intimacy of Olmi’s The Tree of Wooden Clogs which elevates themes of faith and family in a truly expressive fashion. The intimacy of Italy’s mobster genre that gave rise to its particular focus on faith and family, social and political relevance and violence. From the mesmerizing war fable of Life is Beautiful, to the stunning humanist and existential explorations of people lost in the volatility of life in La Dolce Vita and L’Aventura.

Perhaps the most special viewing experience for me, and one that I had before embarking on this journey, was the transcendent Cinema Paradiso. This was a film that helped give definition and longevity to Italian cinema after Neorealism had faded away. It is a film meant to remind a Country and a people of why film (and art in general) is so integral to who they are. It’s a reminder of how intricately tied they are to their past, but of how cinema opens up the possibilities of the future. It’s a love letter to the art form, but even more so its a declaration of the values that cinema can uphold- magic, imagination, community, shared experience, emotion, social awareness. It is a film that allowed me to fall in love with the movies all over again, and through this exercise to really understand how valuable film has been throughout Italian history.

Cinema Parad

THE FUTURE OF ITALIAN CINEMA
For as much as things in this world change, much stays the same. The challenges of globalization can be felt worldwide, and while modern movements such as streaming services have opened up inevitable access to different cultures and places and experiences, one of the realities of our modern age still reflects the familiar existence of these external forces that inhibit these places from being able to form and build a national identity. As the story of Italy shows, there is a fine line that exists between international influence and art that is being shaped by the people according to a particular experience. In a world defined by the most powerful, the most money and the most content, we often forget about about how important film in general is to shaping the Countries that make them (something that is emerging as a constant theme as I move into places like Ukraine down the road as well). International access is not the same as local investment, and when services like Netflix, positioned as rich and dominant outside forces, are the ones controlling output and funding sources that are struggling in many places worldwide, it can turn this idea of globalization into dependence on a singular entity rather than feeding back into the Country itself, which really is a mirror of what we saw emerging from the hollows of Futurism and the end of the Second World War.

capernaum-nadine-labaki-movie

This is why Italy remains so inspiring to me on the subject of culture and film. They are not as prestigious as they once were, but they are still just as authentic, unique and demonstrable as a Country interested in making diverse film for the people and by the people. Alongside this, in the onset of smartphones and streaming services and the loss of many community based endeavors, to visit Italy now is to reclaim those vital human points that connect us to story to begin with. It is a reminder that the only thing final is death, and that living is an artform all its own, and this marriage of a way of life and artistic vision is one that has stood the test of time and makes Italian cinema so endearing.
A final word dealing with De Sica, an “expert on the subject of being disregarded… who informed the actors of his films about how to capture the spirit and voice of the people.”
“He liked human beings most when they are unguarded, naive and possessed by a simple faith in life. He wanted to manifest a kind of trust before things, one that often fails, but at least is there to fail. It’s in the shoeshine boys’ love for the horse they save up to buy, in Umberto D’s feeling for a lonely pregnant girl and for his pet dog; it’s the compassionate openness that allows us to love others.”

HERE IS A LINK TO THE LIST OF FILMS I WATCHED ON MY TRAVELS THROUGH ITALY:
https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/list/film-travels-2020-italy/edit/

What is it that we desire? Reflections on Matthew 8:1-17

This morning at Church our reflection was on Matthew Chapter 8:1-17. This is what the chapter division looks like (NRSV):
Matthew 8:1-4- Jesus Cleanses a leper
Matthew 8:5-13- Jesus Heals a Centurion’s Servant
Matthew 8:14-17- Jesus Heals Many at Peter’s House

Our pastor went on to reflect on how understanding the structure of this passage can help us think more deeply about the nature of our desire and Jesus’ desire for us.

Each section centers around a need and a subsequent healing:
– In the first section we see a leper approach Jesus desiring personal healing.
– In the second second section we see someone approach Jesus desiring someone else’s healing.
– In the third section we see Jesus approaching others with the promise of healing. 

The first thing we can pull from this structure then is this: We all desire something, and clearest evidence that we do comes in our times of need.

But what is most revealing is what this structure tells us about these desires:
SECTION 1: The first section is the easiest entry point into this discussion because it pictures us bringing our need (desire) to Jesus. I feel like most of us can understand this.

SECTION 2: It is slightly less easy to entertain the second section because it forces us to consider the idea of intercession (people going to Jesus on our behalf). This is something I think most of us can understand but have a hard time accepting, investing in, or we take it for granted.


SECTION 3: The third section is by far the most difficult to reconcile because it requires us to believe and trust in this idea that Jesus is pursuing us for the purpose of meeting our desire. And what taking this passage as a whole can show us is that the reason this is difficult is often because of the way we approach Jesus in section one. 

There are three things we can learn from the first section of Chapter 8 that can help us reconcile this idea that Jesus pursues us:
1. “Lord, if you choose..” (8:2) To have desires and expectations that these desire will be met is human. What we find in jesus is the truth that healing is His to give. It is not transactional. To approach Jesus is not a matter of coming with the right words and the right ideas and in the right way. It’s simply to encounter Jesus and trust that healing is His to give.

2. “… make me clean” (8:2) The beauty of this word clean is in the way we can contextualize it into the experience of the leper. This is more than a request for healing, it is a request for transformation. What ails this man also comes with social oppression and isolation, a thoroughline that we find in each of these sections. They are all socially oppressed in some fashion, or as my Pastor suggested, outsiders looking in.

There is a sense in which this word evokes a plea of desperation, an overarching request that he is unable to even articulate in its fullness. All he knows is that he needs Jesus, and recognizing this need in the way that our simple morning confessional states (Lord, something is wrong in me, and around me) can help us understand what our true desire is. Too often we neglect this part, staying on the surface of our daily needs and wants until life forces our hand.

3. “I do choose. Be made clean!” (8:3) Jesus pursues us. The reason our desires matter is because Jesus has desires for us. He desires for us to be made clean, to be healed in the context of our own lives.

RECONCILING JESUS WITH OUR DESIRE
If Jesus has desires for us, and we have desires we hope will be met in our daily lives, it is the question of how these desires match up that makes the third section so difficult to entertain. When they don’t appear to match up we get frustrated. We assume that Jesus is not pursuing us, otherwise why is our life the way it is.

But here is how this truth that desire is Jesus’ alone to give as He chooses can help us see our own desire in a new light. What Jesus desires for us to see the true desire of our heart.  The work of approaching Jesus with the desires that we have is learning to trust that He will help us to know the true desires that they point us towards. This is where the true healing happens, and this is why we all need Jesus.

The work of praying for healing in the lives of others then is to reveal the healing that needs to take place. And the work of Jesus in pursuing us to this end is His desire that we would find the healing that we need, whichwe often do not yet realize.

It’s a powerful realization to know that we can come to Jesus with whatever desires we have, and that we can trust in Jesus to reveal the hidden desires of our heart that motivate them. This is where true transformation can happen.

Perhaps an even more powerful thought is that we can know we are  not in this alone in this process. We have people praying on our behalf and helping us along the way. And we have Jesus, whom scripture tells us is busy taking our desires to the Father and praying on our behalf. And while we might struggle with the idea of others praying for us, and doubt that Jesus cares enough to go out of his way for us when our desires don’t quite match up with the healing He wants to give, the truth is that Jesus is always pursuing us, always with us and always hoping for us to find life in its fullness. This is our great and transformative hope. This is what it means to be redeemed, to discover all of the things we don’t yet have words for, just like the leper in the first section of this passage speaks to the wholeness of his own desperation.

QUESTIONS TO PONDER
Which brings me to our homework this week (yes, we get homework at Church :)). This week we are supposed to reflect on these two questions (which I’ve actually formulated into three questions):
1. What do you actually believe Jesus desires for you?
2. What is it that you desire? 

And in submitting these two questions to our own spiritual reflection, a follow up one:
3. What is it that you actually desire (the deeper desire being revealed to us through the work of the spirit).

2019 In Review: Favorite Movie Experiences

Just to be clear, favorite movie “experiences” is different than my favorite films of 2019. These are the films that represent specific memories, events, moments, or inspiration. It could be a theater experience or something different. I could be something I saw with others or something I saw myself. It can be a film I loved or a film I didn’t love as much. The only prerequisite for making this list is that there is something specific that I can attach to that film or movie going experience that makes it stand out as relevant, important, meaningful, fun, sad, transformative.

What I decided to do is break these favorite movie experiences down into chronological order. That way I can contextualize these experiences into a larger story.

1. Franchise Films and Childhood Memories (RAMBO)
Every year around this time I end up putting together lists of reflections on year past and hopefuls for the new year. This includes putting together a list of most anticipated films, and last year there was one title that had me particularly excited- RAMBO was coming back.

Given the number of franchise films that were releasing in 2019, I decided to jump on the bandwagon and start to engage in some rewatches as a means of preparing. So I dug out my old copy of the series from my closet, dusted it off and decided to invite my 17 year old son in on the endeavor. He agreed and I popped in FIRST BLOOD, my official first viewing of 2019.

That’s when I realized how much of a non-action action film FIRST BLOOD actually was. I mean it wouldn’t be out of the question to suggest it is kind of an arthouse film, and about halfway through I started to think man, Sasha (our son) is not going to like this. That’s when I look over and find him engaged and enthralled. Curious to unpack this unexpected response, I asked him after the film finished what it is that he enjoyed about Rambo. A slew of words came out, but the one thing I picked up on in his answer is that he RELATED to the character. As we continued through the series I started to pay attention to those character beats and soon came to realize why he connected to Rambo- it reminded him of his own upbringing. Adopted from an orphanage, he was raised to fend for himself and without a family home. Growing up in Ukraine, he was also immersed in a particular militaristic environment (largely concerned with Russia) which framed his idea of nationalist pride around the image of Rambo. This is how he saw himself mattering and belonging in a world that seemed to mirror his own.

I know it sounds odd, but this connective tissue between my childhood and his more recent upbringing that emerged around this unlikely and seemingly antiquated hero was a joy to discover. Equally joyous was the chance to build up anticipation for the new theatrical release (LAST BLOOD) by getting him familiar with the story and seeing it finish together. Regardless of what you or I think about the film (he loved it for what it’s worth… brought the story back to FIRST BLOOD), this was one of my most memorable viewing experience because of this.

2. COLD, ATMOSPHERE, CULTURE AND ISOLATION (COLD WAR AND ARCTIC) 
It was around the time of the Oscars that my local theater was finally screening an Oscar hopeful I had been desperate to check of my list, COLD WAR. The weather was a good deal below freezing, and our Northern locale was long since blanketed in snow. Unfortunately the only time I could find to head out was on one of the coldest nights, and it happened to be playing in the theater farthest from me.

Because of the trek I decided to squeeze in a double future to make it worthwhile. Fittingly the other film playing was ARCTIC, helping to really emphasize the temperature factor.

The double feature was great, and COLD WAR ended up being one of my favorite of the International nominated films. What made this experience special though was the environment in which I saw it. Cold War was up first, and the only other ones in my theater were a group of older Polish ladies who came in bundled up and excited about a film they had clearly been looking forward to. During the film I could hear and see them continue to chat excitedly in their language about the film and the story. I have no idea what they were saying, but I certainly was able to observe what the film meant to them as they pointed at the screen and informed each other of details that were foreign to me. It was in this moment that I felt the joy of being there in their midst, experiencing this film through them and with them. Even without the details, this was something I would have missed out on otherwise, and it reminded me of how film expands our world in amazing ways.

Contrast this with my second feature, ARCTIC. I was the only one in the theater watching a movie about a man isolated from the world. The irony was not lost on me 🙂

3. WORLD BUILDING, STORIES AND THE JOY OF CINEMA (ALITA)
Coming back to the story of RAMBO, one of the things I have tried to do in the years since Sasha joined our family is instill in him a love for movies and invest in this as a way to grow it. Which initially wasn’t hard, because when he first arrived to Canada he was thrilled and fascinated by the theater. He loved going, and we went a lot.

The older he gets the less we go unfortunately. It’s the sad reality of the youtube culture that has absorbed him. And so I have to be extra aware of films that catch his eye and films that he might respond to. In 2018 one of his most anticipated was Ready Player One, and it is a film he still talks about to this day. This year the one that seemed to have his attention was ALITA. So I spent a lot of time making sure to replay the trailer when I could, talking about when it was releasing and anticipating plans.

We got to go to ALITA as a family, and it was one of the most joy filled theatrical experiences of the year for me seeing him respond to it with such passion. In conversation afterwards I realized once again that what mattered to him along with the big spectacle and the incredible visuals was the story, and this was a character he connected to because of some auxiliary adoption themes. I wrote about these themes in my Letterboxd review, having these types of stories and characters that are able to speak across our differing experiences and cultural divides is something I know both my wife and I cherish. Now hopefully they’ll find a way to get that sequel done, cause I would love to build on that memorable experience 🙂

4. LITERARY HEROES AND INSPIRATIONAL MOMENTS (TOLKIEN)
If you spent any time with me in 2019, it was likely you were going to pick up on my anticipation for this new biopic called TOLKIEN. I was counting the days, and when it released I was desperate to find my way to it.

Once again, it was playing in the theater farthest from me, and once again I planned out a double feature, TOLKIEN and another biopic AMAZING GRACE. It was a quiet night, and I had settled in for the film, the lights go down and the music and opening visuals begin. I was taken with this film in a matter of seconds, and settled in for what I knew was going to be a meaningful couple hours.

What floored me was how meaningful the film was going to be. This never happens to me, but the film affected me so deeply that I couldn’t do the double feature. Instead of going to Amazing Grace I decided to download the soundtrack and go for a ride just to let it absorb. I didn’t want to lose the moment. It’s one of the few solitary viewing experiences that stands out for me in this way just by nature of being the film that it is (the other being IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK, a film that evoked a very similar experience).

5.  THE POWER OF MUSIC AND THE JOY OF COMMUNITY (AMAZING GRACE)
And it’s a good thing I missed out on that double feature, because the next time I had a chance to see AMAZING GRACE is when it released in my local arthouse theater. It took me two tries (the first was sold out), but I finally got to see this biopic on screen. What makes this such a memorable experience was the people I was able to see it with. I have never in my life been to a film where people were dancing, singing, praying along. All of that was present during my screening, and it was a truly beautiful thing to behold. People were swept away in the music and the musician and the moment.

I am so glad I made that decision. It allowed me the chance to savor and cherish two of my favorite movie going experiences of 2019.

6. RECOMMENDS AND SOCIAL CONNECTIONS  (A TAXI DRIVER and THE HOLLY AND THE IVY)
I have two stories of recommendations that led to special viewing experiences in their own way.

The first comes by way of a Korean family from my Church with whom I happened to one day strike up a conversation about film. Given how much international film I was watching in 2019, I was elated to find out that I was able to share some cultural touchpoints with them through films I had seen.

This led to a recommend of a film that was special to them, one that helped tell the story of Korea’s particular social struggle. It was called A TAXI DRIVER, which they invited me to watch (and that I absolutely loved). There is little that I love more than getting recommends, and the fact that this was one that was offering a little piece of them in an effort to build community made this one of my most memorable viewing experiences of 2019.

A second recommendation that I got this year was for a film called THE HOLLY AND THE IVY. This recommendation excited me because of the way it was given. This individual saw this film, thought of me and felt it would be a great fit with my sensibilities. And they were right on the money. It is a Christmas film that I had never heard of, and it is one that has gone on to become one of my new favorite classics. I watched it on an evening when I was feeling particularly down surrounded by the glow of candlelight, and its message and story resonated with me in a big way.

7. THE PARTICIPATORY AND COLLECTIVE NATURE OF VIEWING FILM TOGETHER (PARASITE AND A BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD)
These two stories are simply and yet equally powerful in their own right. They are two films from this year which truly invited the audience into the story they were telling as participants. And it is the way they did this and the act of experiencing this with a collective audience that made them both so memorable for me. They are films that made my top 5, one of them my #1 of the year, for this reason. They are PARASITE and A BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.

In the case of PARASITE, the film’s films central premise leads us as viewers to a moment where what is a humorous and entertaining ride suddenly takes a shift. It happens so subtly and so powerfully that it caught me and the audience I was seeing it with off guard. The moment takes such a sharp turn that it moves us from laughing to an uncomfortable silence, and the presence of this silence was palpable. Through the silence the film then invites us as viewers to consider how we are to respond to the social commentary being presented to us in such a stark fashion. It’s a moment that shook me and challenged me big time.

A BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD also has a scene in which silence becomes the tool through which to reach its audience. It comes in a diner, and for anyone who knows the story of Rogers it shouldn’t come as a surprise. He was known to evoke silence as a means of connecting with those he is talking to.

And yet, through a brilliant choice of direction the film uses this moment to break the fourth wall in a way I have never experienced before. It turns this from a story we are experiencing to a story that is teaching us directly. It takes the conversation and puts us in the center of it. It is the single most powerful cinematic moment I encountered in 2019, and it left me absolutely humbled and inspired. A true gift.

8. WHERE ART MIRRORS LIFE (ALMOST HOLY)
I think its fitting this late into the story of my year to come to a film I only recently saw this past December. It’s a film called ALMOST HOLY. I knew it was a documentary about a Ukrainian Pastor. What I didn’t know is the personal connection this film was going to evoke. I wrote about it here at length:
https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/film/almost-holy/

But suffice to say that what I did not expect was a film that was essentially going to document Ukrainian’s history from the year that our adopted son was born to the year he arrived home with us in Canada. Because of this time frame, this documentary essentially told the story of the Country in which Sasha was born, the Country he grew up in, and the challenging times it faced leading up our adoption, our own travels and our return. When I realized what was happening I was dumb struck, because where it takes place is not far from our son grew up. And so we were offered something of a peek behind the curtain, some context to his story that we never had before. Amazing, and a real gift.

9. WHEN ART INSPIRES LIFE (UNCUT GEMS)
I’m going to leave this final story here since it is so recent and I wrote about it at length in my review.
https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/film/uncut-gems/

Suffice to say though, I never thought that UNCUT GEMS would be a film that would offer me needed inspiration. It turns out, as cinema can do, it couldn’t have been more timely in my own life.

Year in Review (2019): Top 12 Films of 2019

If its fair to say, as a number of cinephiles would maintain, that 2019 got off to a rocky start for film releases, it would be hard to dispute that it also went out with a bang, even going so far as to make this one of the strongest years for film releases in recent memory.

This certainly made any attempts to filter through my top 30 films an incredibly tough and bitter sweet process. Which simply means two things.

First, it feels fair to say that any of the films in my top 30 not mentioned here could have easily earned a spot in a different year. And second, every film that did end up making my top 12 list of 2019 really stretched me to come up with very specific reasons for why they should be considered over and above the others. This has led, I think, to a fairly diverse representation and a list I can I can say I am proud of and excited for.

If there is a commonality to the 12 that I chose it is that each of these films emphasizes a clear and memorable narrative structure, each of these films vary to degrees in their emphasis on and distinctions between favorite and best (which to me is always the sign of a good year), and each of these are films that I would be super excited to celebrate and champion with others as recommendations (unlike say, The Lighthouse, which got bumped off the list for being too niche… I love it but I wouldn’t know how to recommend it to a wider audience). 

I have included my link here to the full list of films that I watched in 2019 on Letterboxd (which is where I log and review films as I watch), which is based off of 222 film that I saw this year with a 2019 release date. I also included the link to my Letterboxd top 12 in full list form:
https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/list/year-in-review-2019-top-12-films/https://letterboxd.com/davetcourt/list/year-in-review-2019-ranked/

So, with all that said, on to my top 12 films of 2019. I will be counting down here from 12 to my #1 film of the year. Cheers to another year of great films.

 

download (2)12. THE PEANUT BUTTER FALCON
There are so many things I could praise about this touching and affecting drama, but the one thing that really stands out for me is simply this- it is a great story.

With a cast of characters who are defined purposefully and distinctly according to their differences, the film explores the way these differences, using a wonderful travelogue style of narrative, can unite us within relationship. Relationships stretch our understanding of things like family and belonging and see past our differences to remind us of what we share. To call someone a friend or family is freeing, liberating precisely because it calls us to abandon the labels that tell us we are not.

While I personally could have envisioned the film with a different ending than it chooses for itself, the film earns every inch of the ground it treads to get where it does, making this one of the standout emotional gems of 2019.

91N9LM3+FqL._RI_11. LAST BLACK MAN IN SAN FRANCISCO
A memorable narrative with a real creative edge bolsters this films immense and distinct cinematic voice. I love films that exude a real sense of place, and Last Black Man in San Francisco uses cinematography to bring its historical, geographical and contextualized interest to light.

In the case of this film, the conduit is a literal home, the person is the real Jimmy Fails played by the true Jimmy Fails, and the place is the exquisitely captured cityscape of San Francisco, which the film captures through a mix of romanticism and raw honesty.

There is always a richness to films that are influenced or inspired by real life relationships , and the relationship between the Director and (the real world) Jimmy is both palipatable and captivating as it is set against the story of the city that gave it life through the memory of its streets, neighborhoods and house, bearing these things out as an imaginative and eternal force.

“Let us find the courage to see beyond the stories we were born into” is the calling card and desperate cry of this films impassioned concern, which calls on the power of place to reconcile past, present and future, both within the intimacy of their relationship but also in the collective experience of the city and neighborhood that informs it.

ad_astra_DF_00642FD_R2_rgb.010. AD ASTRA
Intimate. Powerful. Dramatic. Visual. Structured as a gradual but progressive world building exercise, Ad Astra begins with an earth centered view and slowly pushes as as viewers further and further outwards towards a more cosmic point of perspective. And with each step outwards, the film builds into this world building exercise greater depths of detail and more expansive pictures of humanities advancement.

At the same time, we are offered a really effective and fascinating parallel line in the character arc of father and son that exposes an innate need to be asking more meaningful and introspective questions surrounding the idea of space travel and human advancement.

By inspiring us to ask these tough questions, and by demonstrating a real and overwhelming concern for the human condition at the same time, this film demonstrates through startling images, breathtaking visuals and profound narrative arc a real theological relevance that definitely left its mark on me in 2019.

Light-of-My-Life-Promo-1024x10249. LIGHT OF MY LIFE
This subtle and quiet gem of a film also happens to be a powerful and hard hitting metaphor for the modern landscape. It reminds us that we are living in world in which the woman’s voice is still being silenced and their place in the world is still being oppressed.

This is 100 percent speculative so take it for what you will, but I still feel that Affleck’s problematic history in this area does appear to take on an almost therapeutic and reconciling presence here, giving this patient drama a personal sense of urgency as well.

This is ultimately a film written around the idea of telling stories, and stories can be a powerful force for personal and cultural reflection. It certainly proves so here. What lingers in this case is a hopeful spirit. If this is a metaphor for particular cultural challenges of both history and our modern age, the story’s arc imagines a future that could and can be shaped in a different kind of trajectory. One in which a woman’s voice is no longer silenced and their presence no longer oppressed.

This is of course an unexpected place to find this message, given this film is in the hands of a male Director who has allegedly contributed to the issue. But it is also a welcome message to find here as well, perhaps the result of a willing and grace filled intention to change and see both his actions and the world a bit differently. And if this also inspires change in us as viewers, this is simply a testament to the power of great films to inspire. And as inspirational films go, this is a standout for me in 2019.

91am5z6Fj1L._RI_8. TOLKIEN
This is without a doubt the most meaningful narrative experience that I encountered in 2019. Exchanging a pure character study of Tolkien the writer for a more prominent thematic exploration of what inspired his writing, the film challenged my expectations and reformed my understanding of the kind of range biopics can have. Using plenty of visuals and rich, tonal undertones, this film brings to light the most important things in Tolkien’s life, and in doing so it illuminates the writer that exists behind the person.

As a big Tolkien fan and enthusiast, the fact that this film took some risks in its approach to familiar Biopic sensibilities is what endeared me to it in such a resonant fashion. It doesn’t necessarily bring much to the table that one wouldn’t already know through other available sources, but what this does do is offer us a spirit filled romp through an iconic individual’s life shaping experiences. We see his loves and how these loves gave shape to his writing, and for me I found this part of the journey to be both emotionally powerful and enlightening in a way few other films were in 2019.

MV5BMTg2NzI4NjY1Nl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTgwNjUxOTc3NTM@._V1_UY1200_CR92,0,630,1200_AL_7. THE MAN WHO KILLED HITLER AND THEN BIGFOOT
A grace filled romp through some impressive narrative, emotional and tonal shifts. This film didn’t make much noise when it released, and many still aren’t aware of its existence, but its technical prowess, cinematic presence, and narrative conviction pairs so perfectly with its enigmatic lead that I couldn’t look away or stop thinking about it for a long time afterwards.

This film checks all of my favorite boxes, not the least of which is its thematic concern. This is a film about what separates man from beast, and recognizes that exploring this theme connects us intimately to both nature and spirit. But it’s the way it explores this theme that was most unexpected, digging deep to offer something incredibly emotional and absolutely profound.

And ridiculously entertaining too. That’s the real icing on the cake here.

joker-trailer6. JOKER
What was likely the most talked about film about 2019 also happens to be a film that reformed our conversation about film moving forward in a variety of ways. This film is the very definition of a cultural touchpoint, and it earns that definition by way of being a truly fascinating and compelling film that is as divisive as it is compelling.

One wouldn’t expect to find this in a film about Batman’s most famous villain, but the ways in which its Director manages the story, approaching it in an astute and sure handed fashion, elevates this story beyond genre distinctions. You could be watching the evolution of the Joker or you could be watching the story of an unstable man responding to the external forces that shaped him. The film works on both levels, and for me represents the most intellectually interesting film of 2019. That it is also an emotional ride, inspiring such different emotional experiences across viewing experiences as well, is astounding and astonishing. It would be near impossible to ignore this film even if I tried, but thankfully this is a film that I don’t want to forget any time soon.

91ZbQIZn1LL._RI_5. THE FAREWELL
I like to call this the little film that could. I don’t think I expected The Farewell to persist so high on my list so far into the year. It takes this spot because of this persistence, which for me is the surest sign that its spot here on my list was truly earned.

There easily could have been something of a cultural divide that might have prevented such a culturally entrenched story from translating across diverse lines. But what The Farewell does so incredibly well is use the story it is telling as a way to embody and speak to this cultural divide. By building this into the fabric of the story it is then able to  bring the nuances of its culturally bound story to the surface, helping a broad audience to really understand who these characters are and what the struggle is. And the more I was able to understand this, the more aware I was of how universal these struggles are.

This film is about the idea of cultural conditionings, particularly as it translates from one foreign culture to another, and in being about this it is able to help us to see in the life of this family both a particular culture and a universal struggle. It’s out of these two things that The Farewell is able to traverse an impress amount of emotional ground, evoking plenty of happy tears and sad tears along the way.

MV5BZjU0Yzk2MzEtMjAzYy00MzY0LTg2YmItM2RkNzdkY2ZhN2JkXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyNDg4NjY5OTQ@._V1_4. JO JO RABBIT
I am a big fan of Taika Waititi, so when he releases a project that I consider to be his best work, it comes as no surprise to me that it would land this high on my end of year rankings.

The concept definitely comes with a good deal of risk, but it reaps immense reward with its ability to use Waitit’s token humor to tap into an immense cross section of emotions and meaningful dialogue and commentary. Stylistically this film could be considered a masterclass in filmmaking all its own, but the richness of the characters and the execution of its story are what make me convinced that conceptually this could only have worked with Waititi as its guiding force.

This is one that’s going to persist in my cinematic consciousness for many years to come, I’m certain of this. Hopeful notes are huge for me in film, and the fact that this was able to bring a hopeful and redemptive light to one of the darkest pieces of human history that we know is an incredible feat. That it manages to do this without making light of the tragedy, even elevating it for me to certain visceral and contemplative levels I hadn’t considered before, is astounding.

MV5BYWZjMjk3ZTItODQ2ZC00NTY5LWE0ZDYtZTI3MjcwN2Q5NTVkXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyODk4OTc3MTY@._V1_UY1200_CR90,0,630,1200_AL_3. PARASITE
The second most memorable theatrical experience of 2019 for me. There are films that hit harder on an emotional level in 2019, that is for sure. But what this film undoubtedly is is a true technical masterpiece from start to finish. It is immaculately crafted towards a true social experience, which is precisely what allows its powerful social commentary to take front and center. You have a series of characters that are represented in complex ways, leaving viewers in a complicated place in terms of knowing where to place our empathy over the course of this film.

And this is where the film elevates our own participation in the story. By playing with this sense of allegiance and our penchant for needing to know where to attach our emotions in a given story, the lack of immediate clarity it provides in terms of who these characters are and what it is that motivates them to do what they do allows the film to turn this narrative on ourselves, forcing us to reckon with how it is that we enter into discussions of social concern within our own context. And once some of these motivations begin to gain some clarity, much of that coming in retrospect for me, the film raises to a whole other level yet.

It’s uncomfortable, humbling and also revealing, and its a viewing experience I won’t soon forget.

large_550_tmp_2F1564689670242-l594ae4eo6-23f90fa1fffd7eb7f27b5a097cb2232c_2Fimage0032. ONCE UPON A TIME IN HOLLYWOOD
This is a love letter to cinema through and through, both as an artform and as an experience. The technicals on display here, from the narrative vision to the set design to the music to the casting to the camera work, are all something to behold. This is the rich stuff of a true master, and it is a film that seems to reflect someone who has spent years honing his craft and is now reflecting on his own life’s work at the same time. There is a maturity here that I don’t think we have seen in this Director before, bringing his wealth of experience to the table in a way that feels deeply personal.

For me this is hands down the most complete film of 2019, and it is one that will only get better with age.

MV5BYmI3YWFkNTUtZWYzMC00M2FmLWE2YjgtYTRjNTY2MmFiOGQ2XkEyXkFqcGdeQWFybm8@._V1_CR0,78,1500,844_AL_UX477_CR0,0,477,268_AL_1. A BEAUTIFUL DAY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD
This was one of my most anticipated films of 2019, so I came into it with a whole lot of expectation. That the film caught me so off guard and gave me something so unexpected is a testament to the brilliance of this films vision. This film isn’t technically perfect, but it represents the most perfect and powerful emotional experience of 2019 for me personally.

I also feel like the film couldn’t be more timely or necessary. This is a film about cynicism, and the way it uses the story of a cynic to explore the spirit of who Mr. Rogers was in such an incredible and deeply affecting way is something I am still shaken over and caught by as I write this.

There are a couple different facets of filmmaking that could define this films strengths, one of those being the Direction, the other being its vision and structure. Both of these things come around a narrative idea that I felt couldn’t have been a more perfect way back into the story that we came to love in the previous Documentary. It’s a one two punch that works in true and pure complimentary fashion.

This isn’t your usual biopic. What it is is an artistic take on an iconic figure that we all know, and feel we know personally and intimately, from Hank’s brave interpretation that avoids any sense of impersonation, to the set design that helps us re-imagine Mr. Rogers show from a slightly different point of view, to the message about forgiveness, to the way it gave me my most memorable theatrical experience of 2019. This was a film concerned for the collective, and a film interested in reaching the collective with a real message that is able to say something about what cynicism is and how we counter it.

This absolutely believe this film was a true gift. I laughed, I cried, I learned, and I even participated. It is a testament to what the power of cinema can be and do, and it is a film I am proud to have as my #1 of the year.

 

Rosebud 2020: A New Years Resolution Plan

A few years ago I started a New Years Resolution Plan called Rosebud, which I heard about through one of my travel podcasts. Rosebud is less about making goals and more about setting a direction. One of the benefits of logging this from year to year is that it allows me to see these year to year plans as part of a larger narrative as opposed to a simple checkpoint of things that will qualify as either a failure or success. This makes this exercise an ideal point of reflection that can help give shape to where I am focusing my attention in a given year.

The process essentially looks like this:

Step 1: List Three Roses-
This is the stuff that I would consider the greatest strengths, successes or accomplishments of the past year, the stuff that has managed to blossom into a Rose.

Step 2: List One Thorn
This would reflect my greatest personal struggle of the past year.

Step 3: List Three Buds
Weight my strengths against my weakness and come up with a list of 3 things (goals) I would like to “bud” into Roses in the coming year.

Step 4: Come up with a word for the year
This should be a single word that can help reflect the direction I want to head in the coming year, a single word that can give my year a theme or a recognizable focus and narrative.

A quick added note on this challenge. The reason for the disparity between the number of strengths and weakness, something I asked myself when I started this process, is human nature. For as much as we sometimes demonstrate differently on the outside, if you ask the average person (and there are stats and research to back this up as well) to list their strengths they are likely to have a really hard time being able to come up with more than one. Ask them to list their weaknesses though and a good number of us can come up with a list longer than a page on the spot.

Setting the challenge up like this pushes us into some uncomfortable spaces and keeps us from getting lost in an exercise of self lament. It focuses us towards the positive and the potential for growth.

Looking Back at My Rosebud 2019 Challenge
Weakness: Cynicism
3 Buds:
1. Reconsider and give thought to where I am with the idea of ministry as a vocation
2. Challenge myself (as an introvert with strong social anxiety) to talk and listen more to people I do not know well or at all.
3. Use my reading and film related challenges to help me grow in a greater awareness of the place where I live (think about how to make the most out of home, work and neighborhood), and consider some larger perspective questions on what this life is all about.
One Word: Perspective

Rosebud 2020
3 Roses
1. Dedication to my film related challenge
Last year I challenged myself to really lean into the end of a decade by using 2019 to catch up on my film watchlist, including blindspots and lists. To help me do that I came up with a plan. Each month I worked through one year from the past decade (2010’s), compiling lists of films and prioritizing them. At the end of the month I would then come up with a top list for that year, working towards a final top 100 films of the decade list which is to be finished and posted before the new year in this space.

To say that this was successful is an understatement. I have had by far my most successful year in film yet. I am part of an online film community and database called Letterboxd that documents and keeps stats of what I watch. According to these stats, and with 4 days left on the calendar year, I have logged 782 Diary Entries, 772 Reviews, 49 Lists and 1393 film watching hours. I have always loved film, but this is very much an anomaly that is unlikely to ever happen again.

What it does speak to though is the dedication I was able to find to sticking with my goal, something that also required a willingness and need to adjust and improvise. Early on I recognized that I couldn’t keep up with both the film challenge AND plans to read and write, and so I allowed the latter two to fall by the wayside. And it payed dividends for my ability to focus on something more manageable. This is a learning I hope can translate in positive ways into other areas of my life.

2. More integrated with my students at work
I am a School Bus Driver. Given the nature of my job, every year sees transition and movement in the students that I drive. The last two years I had a particularly rough group of students. To help respond to this I decided to make part of the focus of last years challenge spending more time with my students. Given how rough it was it was far too easy to simply avoid the situation by spending time in the coffee room or chatting with other teachers rather than embracing the time I have with them in between and during runs.

Efforts last year feel to be paying dividends this year with a fresh group that is more open to interaction. Given that success, this year feels like a good opportunity to push this even further by establishing even stronger relationships.

3. Got reconnected with the youth group
It took a while and some wrestling with this idea, but I decided to come on board as a leader for the youth at our Church as part of this process of working through the question that I was pondering from last year- is ministry done with me or am I done with ministry (vocationally speaking).

So far I feel oddly like a fish out of water, having to navigate territory that feels like it should be familiar but, largely thanks to anxiety and ministry baggage, feels foreign. As someone already with social anxiety, starting from scratch brings with it a thousand and one relationship dynamics from leaders to students to my own son who is graduating and in his final year of youth group that feel entirely overwhelming and make every youth night feel like one very big step into the unknown and the uncertain. But it is a step nonetheless, and we will see how this goes.

1 Thorn: Anxiety
This is both internal and external, social and psychological, and it’s even more realized in its online form (social media, groups and communities, messaging).

I’ve picked this thorn because, the longer I do this Rosebud challenge the more opportunity there is for personal growth. And the more opportunity there is for personal growth the stronger the force of this anxiety seems to become. I feel it particularly when it comes to this time of year (Christmas), a time that I cherish for the ways it lets me let go of some of these concerns if only for a moment, but that also feels heightened in the challenge to maintain this overwhelming concern for letting go of this anxiety for a season and focusing on things that are important and that matter.

Anxiety, wherever it rears its ugly head, has a way of taking a whole year of positives and spinning them in a negative direction.

3 Buds
1. Read more and write more intentionally
This past year with the success of my film challenge, my ability to keep up with writing and reading took a hit. My goal this year is to create a more integrated challenge that will better connect my film watching experience to my reading and my writing. I’ve been leading up to this in the back half of 2019, but my plan for 2020 is to travel the world in film while integrating this more intentionally with a reading and writing plan. Here is a link to the particulars of this challenge:

2020 FILM, WRITING AND READING CHALLENGE
I wrote a separate blog in this space on the particulars, but here is some of what I am focusing on this year, the reasons why, and the ways I hope it enriches my engagement with art, culture as a social form. Here’s the link:
https://findingmeatfortysite.wordpress.com/2019/12/27/my-2020-film-writing-and-reading-challenge/?fbclid=IwAR16OC59ou1DJii2gbgnS0ckI7kudGr7zdsK5rZ6UR4UaUD7uA1WC3oSfig

2. Grow my sense of place and perspective even more
There are some interesting and significant transitions coming for us in the next couple years that could see us wrestling with any number of spirit led nudges that could broaden our world and our sense of place. As I travel the world in film and reading, one of the things I want to do is start to give thought to how this broadening awareness and perspective translates to life at home. Which leads into my third bud.

3. Invest in Family traditions
Speaking of anxiety riddled scenarios, our son, whom we adopted at 13, is graduating this year. Turning 18 and seeing the end of this part of his journey on the horizon is bringing with it a whole host of changes and questions. One of the most overwhelming is thinking back on the ways we have tried to instill in him a sense of family and what family means. Adoption brings with it a very unique set of concerns and challenges in terms of how family happens and how family is established. The bonding is particular and attachment never something we can take for granted. As graduation approaches, it feels important to be even more intentional this year about how we invest in continuing to build this sense of family that he is learning, figuring out and hopefully coming to trust in.

This reminds me of a book I read a few years back from one of my favorite authors, Jonathan Wilson Hartgrove, called The Wisdom of Stability. It is all about balancing growth and movement with investment in the places we occupy now. In a world where the one constant is change and where change is happening all around us at a rate unlike anything we’ve seen before in human history, stability feels counterintuitive and even boring. And yet it is also essential. For us as a family, this is a crucial year for helping us all to embrace the changes that will come with Sasha’s graduation while helping all of us to know that family will always be here no matter where these changes lead us.

My Word For the Year: Stability